Residents of Covington, Washington, are expressing significant opposition to a proposed battery storage facility in their city, citing concerns about safety and environmental impact. The project, which involves the construction of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS), has ignited controversy among locals and officials alike.

Opposition by Residents

Located next to Mattson Middle School on SE 251st Street, the proposed BESS site has sparked fears among residents about potential hazards. Despite arguments from experts that BESS is a cost-effective method for grid backup, many residents fear the proximity of the facility to residential areas and schools.

Safety Concerns

One resident, James DeLay, acknowledges the importance of clean energy but insists that BESS sites should be situated in industrial zones, away from homes and schools. He highlights the potential consequences of a fire, citing past incidents in Melba, Idaho, and Chandler, Arizona, where BESS sites caused significant evacuations and property damage.

Community Opposition

The Kent School District has formally opposed the project, expressing concerns about health, safety, and noise impacts. Covington City Councilmembers have also raised questions about the project’s safety and oversight, emphasizing the need for thorough risk assessment and monitoring.

Regulatory Challenges

While Covington city council members have voiced concerns, the final decision lies with King County authorities, as the proposed site falls within unincorporated King County. Despite residents’ belief that the project had stalled, recent revelations regarding wetland mitigation efforts have reignited fears of potential development.

Regulatory Response

The Department of Ecology clarified that the Army Corps of Engineers has no jurisdiction over the wetlands in question, rendering Tenaska’s application for wetland mitigation null and void. As of now, no further applications have been filed, leaving the project’s future uncertain.

Company Response

Tenaska, the Nebraska-based company behind the proposed facility, remains noncommittal about future plans. While they emphasize their commitment to safety and stakeholder engagement, they have not confirmed whether they will proceed with the project.

Potential Next Steps

If Tenaska decides to move forward, they may apply to the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC), a state agency responsible for evaluating energy projects. EFSEC’s decision ultimately goes to the governor for approval, ensuring a rigorous regulatory process.

Conclusion: Continuing Debate

The controversy surrounding the proposed battery storage facility in Covington underscores the complex interplay between clean energy initiatives and local concerns. As residents and officials grapple with safety and environmental considerations, the future of the project remains uncertain.

For more information on EFSEC’s process and how to submit public comments, residents can visit EFSEC’s website. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

Download The Local News App to stay informed about local developments and community issues.

Source