Convicted Murderer’s Intellectual Disability Ruling Revisited

โ€”

by

in

In a recent development, the case of Justin Thurber, convicted for the 2007 murder of Jodi Sanderholm in Arkansas City, has resurfaced. A report by the Courier-Traveler indicates that Thurber’s intellectual disability status is under scrutiny once again.

Background

  • Thurber was sentenced to death in 2009 for the murder of Sanderholm.
  • His defense team has persistently argued that he is intellectually disabled since 2017.

Legal Decision

A Cowley County District Court judge recently ruled that Thurber does not meet the criteria to be considered intellectually disabled. This decision marks a significant turn in Thurber’s legal battle. The case has now been remanded back to the Kansas Supreme Court for further consideration.

Examination Criteria

  • The court’s decision was based on the narrowing criteria for intellectual disability within the legal system.
  • Thurber’s IQ, reportedly in the 70s, hovers on the borderline of intellectual disability.

Judge’s Ruling

Judge Nicholas St. Peter, in his April ruling, emphasized that there isn’t sufficient evidence to conclude that Thurber possesses deficits in intellectual function. St. Peter’s assessment considered both clinical evaluation and standardized intelligence testing.

Conclusion:

Thurber’s case continues to attract legal attention, with debates surrounding his intellectual disability status. The recent ruling raises questions about the evolving understanding of intellectual disability within the legal framework.

To stay updated on this and other local news stories, download The Local News App today.

Source: KWCH, Courier-Traveler

Source

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

DISCLAIMER: This article is written by AI. If any of your copyrighted materials, similar names or likeness is used herein it was done accidentally and can be fixed by sending an email to [email protected] explaining the problem. We will rectify any issues immediately. However, any copyrighted or trademarked materials that are used here are protected under 17 U.S.C. ยง 107 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 17. Copyrights ยง 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use in that it is provided for purposes of reporting the news.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Like Our New App?

Download The Local News App to your device to stay up to date with all the local news in your area.

Just follow the prompt when it comes up and enjoy.