Service Corporation International (SCI), the nation’s largest funeral company, has agreed to a $23 million settlement to resolve charges of deceptive marketing practices concerning its prepaid cremation services in California. The settlement, announced by Attorney General Rob Bonta, addresses allegations that SCI engaged in misleading practices related to prepaid cremation services operated under the names Neptune Society and Trident Society in California.

Deceptive Marketing Allegations

SCI was accused of violating California’s unfair competition law and false advertising law by misrepresenting its prepaid cremation services in several ways. The allegations included deceptive tactics such as:

• Misleading statements regarding the refundability of prepaid services.
• Inadequate placement of payments into trust for prepaid services.
• Bundling merchandise and cremation services without fully disclosing refund policies.

Settlement Details

The $23 million settlement includes payments of $5.75 million each to the state of California and the counties of Marin, San Francisco, and Alameda, whose district attorneys participated in the civil complaint. Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price emphasized the significance of the settlement in ensuring compliance with the law and providing relief to affected consumers.

SCI’s Response and Previous Legal Issues

SCI denied any wrongdoing but agreed to cease the deceptive practices outlined in the complaint. The company, headquartered in Texas, has faced legal challenges in various states and at the federal level, including previous allegations of false advertising. Despite repeated lawsuits and penalties, SCI did not respond to requests for comment on the recent settlement.

Impact on Consumers and Industry

San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins highlighted the importance of the settlement in deterring similar deceptive practices by other companies operating in the preneed cremation industry. The resolution of this case underscores the vulnerability of consumers, particularly the elderly, in navigating prepaid funeral arrangements and the need for stringent oversight to protect their interests.

Conclusion: Ensuring Consumer Protection

The settlement reached with SCI represents a significant step in holding companies accountable for deceptive marketing practices in the funeral industry. As consumers increasingly rely on prepaid services for end-of-life arrangements, it is essential to enforce regulations that safeguard their interests and ensure transparency in financial transactions. The resolution of this case serves as a reminder of the ongoing efforts required to uphold consumer protection standards in sensitive sectors such as funeral services.

Source