In a dramatic turn of events, New York prosecutors dropped charges against three individuals embroiled in a legal battle over the ownership of hand-drafted lyrics to iconic Eagles songs, including Hotel California. The case, which captured public attention for its unusual premise, took a surprising twist midway through the trial.

Prosecution’s Backtrack and Reasoning

New York prosecutors unexpectedly withdrew their case against collectibles experts Glenn Horowitz, Craig Inciardi, and Edward Kosinski. The trio faced accusations of involvement in a scheme to retain and sell the disputed pages, alleged to have been stolen from Eagles co-founder Don Henley. The decision to drop the charges came after the emergence of crucial evidence that had not been disclosed to the defense earlier in the proceedings. Assistant Manhattan District Attorney Aaron Ginandes cited the belated disclosure of over 6,000 pages of communications involving Henley and his legal team, which highlighted information relevant to the defense’s case.

Defendants Cleared of Charges

Following the dismissal, rare books dealer Glenn Horowitz, former Rock & Roll Hall of Fame curator Craig Inciardi, and memorabilia seller Edward Kosinski were cleared of all charges, including conspiracy to possess stolen property. The case revolved around approximately 100 pages of legal-pad lyrics from the creation of the Eagles’ renowned album Hotel California, a best-selling classic in the music industry.

Defense’s Argument and Response

The defendants maintained their innocence, asserting rightful ownership of the lyrics pages. They contended that the materials were acquired legitimately and not obtained through theft. In a written statement, Inciardi expressed relief at the case’s resolution, emphasizing the need to rebuild their reputations. Kosinski, visibly pleased with the outcome, refrained from further comment, while Horowitz left court without addressing the media.

Ongoing Legal Implications

Despite the dropped charges, Don Henley’s legal representation signaled a potential pursuit of civil action in response to the verdict. Attorney Dan Petrocelli reiterated Henley’s position as the victim and vowed to explore all available legal avenues. Similarly, Kosinski’s legal team indicated a thorough evaluation of future actions, suggesting dissatisfaction with the handling of the case by the district attorney’s office.

Judicial Critique and Revelation

Judge Curtis Farber criticized the prosecution, suggesting manipulation and oversight in the handling of crucial information. He highlighted the exploitation of attorney-client privilege to conceal damaging details, further underscoring the complexities and challenges faced throughout the trial.

Insights from Trial Proceedings

The trial provided insights into the heyday of the Eagles’ career, delving into creative processes, contractual agreements, and personal anecdotes of band members. Testimonies revealed intimate details about the

Source