COLUMBUS, Ohio – Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has come under fire for a recent letter he sent to the state’s public universities, raising concerns about potential felony charges for student protesters wearing face coverings. The letter, which warns of consequences under a little-known law originally aimed at deterring Ku Klux Klan demonstrations, has stirred sharp criticism from various quarters.

Historical Context: The Anti-Disguise Law

The Prohibition Against Conspiracy While Wearing a Disguise Law, enacted in Ohio in 1953, was initially designed to address acts of violence by the Ku Klux Klan. However, its application in contemporary times has sparked debate, particularly regarding its potential use against student protesters on college campuses.

Current Scenario: Student Protests at Ohio State University

In recent weeks, anti-Israel demonstrators have gathered on college campuses nationwide, including Ohio State University (OSU). Several individuals have faced misdemeanor trespassing charges following protests at OSU.

Attorney General’s Warning

In his letter to the state’s public universities, Attorney General Yost cautioned administrators about the potential application of the anti-disguise law to impose felony charges on protesters wearing face coverings. Violating this law could result in a fourth-degree felony charge and fines of up to $5,000.

Criticism from Civil Rights Leaders

Nana Watson, president of the Columbus branch of the NAACP, denounced the use of a law originally intended to combat Klan violence against modern-day protesters. She described the Attorney General’s stance as disrespectful to African Americans and out of touch with current realities.

Response from Ohio State University

OSU officials confirmed receipt of the letter and stated they are reviewing its contents. President Ted Carter emphasized that no immediate action was being taken in response to the letter.

Attorney General’s Defense

In a NEWS.ORG News appearance, Yost defended his letter as providing legal advice to prevent inadvertent violations of the law. He clarified that the law is only applicable when individuals are engaged in criminal activities while wearing masks, emphasizing that advising compliance with the law is not intended to intimidate or offend.

Uncertain Future for Student Demonstrations

While current arrests at OSU protests have not resulted in felony charges, the newfound awareness of the anti-disguise law among university administrators and protesters raises questions about its potential impact on future demonstrations across Ohio’s college campuses.

Source