MILWAUKEE – The political landscape in Wisconsin has been shaken following the historic guilty verdict of former President Donald Trump. On May 30, Trump was convicted of falsifying business records to suppress stories of extramarital affairs during his 2016 presidential campaign, marking the first time a former president has been found guilty of felony crimes.

Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over the case, scheduled Trump’s sentencing for July 11, just days before the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. An appeal is expected to be filed promptly.

Wisconsin Reactions

The verdict has generated a wide range of responses from Wisconsin’s political figures, reflecting the deep divisions within the state.

Republican Response

Brian Schimming, Chair of the Republican Party of Wisconsin:
Schimming expressed that this verdict represents a misuse of the legal system for political purposes. He believes the prosecution was driven by a political agenda rather than the pursuit of justice. Schimming emphasized that this situation is a national embarrassment and predicted that voters will voice their disapproval in the upcoming elections by supporting Trump.

Eric Hovde, Republican Senate Candidate:
Hovde shared his view that the case should have been addressed years ago if it had any merit. He lamented that the judicial system has been compromised and turned into a platform for political theatrics. He stressed that the timing of this prosecution is an overt act of election interference, undermining the integrity of the judicial process.

Democratic Response

Ben Wikler, Chair of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin:
Wikler highlighted that Trump was judged by a jury, a fundamental aspect of the American justice system. He underscored that the law applies equally to everyone, and this case reaffirms that principle. Wikler posed a broader question to the nation about who should lead the federal government, emphasizing the importance of accountability.

U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wisconsin):
Moore expressed confidence in the judicial process, stating that the jury made its decision based on the evidence presented. She affirmed that justice was served, showing trust in the system’s ability to function impartially.

Voter Impact

A recent NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist National Poll indicates that the guilty verdict may not significantly influence voters’ decisions. According to the poll:

• Two-thirds of registered voters nationwide said the verdict does not affect their voting intentions.
• 17% mentioned they would be less likely to vote for Trump.
• 15% stated they would be more inclined to vote for him.

Broader Implications

The reactions in Wisconsin reflect a broader national debate about the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process, especially when high-profile political figures are involved. Critics argue that certain judges, backed by globalist donors and holding personal biases against Trump, should have recused themselves to avoid conflicts of interest. Additionally, some District Attorneys and prosecutors are accused of pressing charges beyond the statute of limitations to create political disruption.

Download The Local News App

Stay updated with the latest news and reactions from around the country. Download The Local News App to get breaking news alerts directly to your phone. Click download on the prompt to stay informed.

Source